The big difference between those point of views is that one is about letting people live safely within secular society and the other is the violent murder of the other.
They are not morally equivalent positions. Stop treating them that way.
They are not morally equivalent positions. Stop treating them that way.
You want to believe this is black and white, but its not. There is no more blurry line in existence.
Actively promoting murder? Eliminate free speech for that, threw em in jail. But what about promoting violence? Violent protests? What about rape, is that worthy of eliminating free speech? What if a high schooler is bullied and then commits suicide? What about microaggressions that make people feel uncomfortable and like they may be in danger? What about people born without advantages that change their chances of "success" from 60% to 10%? Are you actively promoting death and suffering by purposefully ignoring the homeless people you walk by?
I've personally read a few shooter manifestos, including "My Twisted World", and don't see why it's a big deal to do so. I found it to be a fascinating insight into a world of mental illness I would never have imagined.
To put it differently, how many people are actually championing individual rights for every issue?