Alan Turing, Condemned Code Breaker and Computer Visionary
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
I think Turing is probably the most famous in his own time to have been in “Overlooked”. Charlotte Bronte also has been featured but she died in the 19th century.
Although many on HN have probably never heard of her, I would argue Fannie Farmer was just about as famous as a woman could be in her time. Not only was she the Martha Stewart media mogul of the early 1900's but she was one of the early pioneers of modern nutrition science. She was so well respected in the field that she was invited to teach a course at Harvard Medical School decades before women would even be permitted to enroll.
She's also the reason we all have measuring spoons and cups in our kitchens.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_things_named_after_Ala...
I was fairly sure there was a roundabout in Manchester called the Turing roundabout...
Few people know any of those names today. Zuse should be remembered more. He had the right idea, and built a working machine, but it was destroyed by bombs during WWII.
Mostly they just say that his work was destroyed, and not much more, which is a shame! And then they devote hundreds of pages to his contemporaries.
I searched Amazon and apparently has an autobiography, which doesn't appear to be widely read:
https://www.amazon.com/Computer-My-Life-Konrad-Zuse/dp/35405...
In the 1990s, I had to go through considerable lengths to obtain a physical copy of his book describing his "Plankalkül" programming language; nowadays it's conveniently available online.
I don't think he's primarily remembered for his work on cryptanalysis. I think he's primarily remembered for the Turing test, followed by the Turing machine model, followed by his work on morphogenesis. That's just my opinion as a working mathematician.
There are other plenty of people overlooked for WWII contributions due to secrecy, and I was disappointed by how much the NYTimes article focused specifically on that aspect of Turing's work and deemphasized the rest, but it's just flat out false that Turing would be a minor figure in computing history if not for his sexual orientation.
> The ACM started giving the Turing Award in 1966.
Obviously after the release of the wartime work his place in history grew.
It was only after that declassification of Bletchley that anyone heard of Tommy Flowers and his work at GPO research. Up til that point even his family didn't know his contribution. Flowers should be far better known than he is, but anyone encountering the Enigma codebreaking story in the last 40+ years should come across his story. I do think it criminal they got so little official recognition.
- Introduced the concept of ordinal logic, an apporach to overcoming the limitations of Goedel's incompleteness theorems, a thriving field as of 2019. See [1].
- Gave the definite analysis of the notion of "mechanical computability", see [2].
- Essentially invented the field of AI, with key contributions such as Neural Networks [3] (but see [4, 5, 9]) and the Turing test [6].
- Work in chemistry / biology, see [7, 8].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordinal_logic
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_machine
[3] https://www.info2007.net/docs/intelligent-machinery-alan-tur...
[4] http://compucology.net/unorganized
[5] http://compucology.net/criticism
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test
[7] http://www.dna.caltech.edu/courses/cs191/paperscs191/turing....
[8] https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/05/alan-turings-contrib...
[9] http://www.alanturing.net/turing_archive/pages/Reference%20A...
What really gets me is that--as jgrahamc pointed out--you said this same thing two years ago, and were corrected in the same way. Which means you knew this was wrong, and you posted it anyway.
I can't comprehend being so troubled by the existence of historical gay people that you're willing to deliberately lie to discredit them.