"the extent that Gmail is profiling you and surveilling your email" - A serious description of the fundamental technology that a spam filter uses.
The purchase history that google shows me clearly says that google is only showing this to me, this information will not be shared.
See screenshot from my account https://ibb.co/jhkCSjK
Well the truth is, most companies are a lot more hostile with your data than google. Privacy centric services are incredible dangerous. We have seen that VPNs always log your data. (And thereby are completely redundant) You remember lulzsec? https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/09/lulzs...
Overall the purchases page is only there to give me a better overview over my data. And I am fine with google having my data. Most companies are less trustworthy than google. Splitting my data over dozens of other services is a guarantee that one of them will sell my data to the outside.
The price of using google is that google gets free data from you. The pro is that this data is top secure and only used to serve targeted ads and confirm to subpoenas.
Most companies are just going to sell your data to anyone willing to pay for it, including bounty killers. https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/8/18174024/att-sprint-t-mobi...
So yes. Google isn't good, but I can clearly tell what they are doing and what they are not doing. I trust google not to sell my data because they can get more value out of my data using it themselves and I actually don't have a problem with (reasonable) targeted ads.
Privacy-centric email providers don't retain any data from your emails after scanning for spam. Gmail does, and in unexpected places that I keep discovering and hearing about, and as far as I know, there is no Gmail switch to say, "Do the spam filtering but don't keep any data".
> google is only showing this to me, this information will not be shared
They can easily change their own policy on that, and they regularly do change their policy. Also, as you already mentioned, they'll share it after a subpoena. I don't want them to have or keep that data at all.
Privacy-centric email providers send your emails to /dev/null after they have been scanned for spam? Your definition is absurd.
I’m exhausted.
Your answer makes a lot of sense to me. I too am exhausted by the number of creeping privacy violations I can do nothing about. (But switching email providers is something I do have control over.)
Google gave me an instant answer on how to migrate from FF to chrome. I immediately closed my default browser, went and played some Tetris on our Sega arcade machine, and tried to forget I'm both extremely privacy aware and extremely disappointed in Google.
Edited (spelling)
I can only see mixed results with queries like "migrate chrome firefox" or "migrate firefox chrome", which have no disambiguation about the direction of the migration at all. For those, the top result I see is migrating to Chrome and the second is migrating from Chrome. Given the ambiguity, that hardly seems malicious.
[0] https://www.howtogeek.com/333047/how-to-migrate-all-your-dat...
Gmail can unilaterally lock you out of your email at any moment, immediately and forever, with no recourse nor consumer protections.
That, for me, would be mighty annoying.
First, there's little I can do about it, even if I'm not on gmail. So many people are, so Google has copies of most of my email even if I'm not using them.
Second, this is a small wrong in the world; I've literally never heard of political violence linked to someone's use of Gmail, while I have heard this about a variety of other services. It's a little disturbing, but there are "evil corp" things much closer to home that I reserve my change-the-world energy for.
Third, on a basic level, there's nothing wrong with this service, or any of the various privacy-invading services. The problem is that, right now, the mega-corps are all so unrestricted from passing my data around to one another, building giant profiles.
What I want is to be able to share my data freely with anyone, but for them to be heavily restricted from sharing it, under serious penalty, until I say it's okay. I want a cultural and legal shift around privacy to take place, so that companies have to respect my ownership of my data as a primacy, but then I want them to be able to do whatever cool stuff they want with it.
Location sharing? That shit's awesome. If you're meeting up with people in a new city, there's no better way to do it. But my telco and mapping providers had better be under corporate death penalty not to share that with anyone, under any circumstances.
That's the world I want, not one where these things don't exist, just one where I and every other user of the tools is in charge of what we do with them.
I think you pretty much described the GDPR there (or at least part of it)
Custom filters and sorting with colored labels as they arrive in my inbox. Adding things automatically to my calendar. Better spam filtering.