Firefly raises $30M to bring more ads to Ubers, Lyfts and taxis
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
It's interesting how he left customers out of this description. I guess "win-win-win-lose" probably didn't test well.
I'll avoid using any service that adopts this, and can only hope that there will remain at least one who doesn't.
I guess this is ride sharing's path to being profitable, more intrusive advertising. Or pay a premium to get an ad-free ride.
If this is the future of ride sharing, looks like owning a car isn't going out of style anytime soon.
I don't like this, but it seems being advertised to at every possible moment is the price we pay for our societies' current modern development
It's the opposite - advertising is a parasitic phenomenon, leeching talent and resources that could otherwise be spent more productively, and what we get in return is an information environment skewed to make us spend money, and a landscape marred by this visual cancer.
But ads are in no way a fact of life we have to get used to - they can be defeated, or at least kept at bay. Some cities have banned them: http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5338
Carry a paper napkin or restickable mouse pad with you
You could also just ask the driver to turn the screen off without threatening to cancel the trip as a first step.
But, with real taxis anyway, this is what I will do.
> You could also just ask the driver to turn the screen off without threatening to cancel the trip as a first step.
Yes, that is the actual approach I'd take. It's always nice to start as nonconfrontational as possible. But since I won't be taking the ride if the screen is on, the entire exchange has to be complete before the ride actually starts.
Fixed that for you.
It’s a shame that 30M is being burned to make the daily routing even worse for hundreds of thousands of people instead of improving it.