GNU Audio and Video
audio-video.gnu.org
audio-video.gnu.org
FSF is Richard Stallman. No discussion shall be entered into. Zero diversity of opinion. What RMS thinks right now is right and if you disagree you're not welcome.
The Free Software Foundation should change its name to reflect this fact. It's the RMS's current views on software foundation. It's alienating. Would I assign my intellectual property to the FSF when its really just RMS? Yeah I don't think so. If the FSF being just RMS's toy is wrong then how did this happen? How did the FSF impersonate an autocrat's fiefdom like this? Something is on the nose here, argue about what but it's not nothing.
And seeing RMS evangelizing for GNU/FSF is not strange, he pretty much started the whole movement and his/FSF's "agenda" has been publicly known for years, so whatever conspiracy you are thinking of doesn't exist.
It's not a conspiracy it's an observation. Who other than RMS influences FSF policy? Anyone? When they disagree with RMS. The FSF is RMS. But thanks for the "you're a conspiracy theorist" trope. Much appreciated. Sure doesn't make me feel bullied at all...