I thought I wanted to move up the chain, until I found myself with a team of ~10 people, some of them managing people below them.
Completely miserable. I didn’t have much control over salary policies or promotions so I basically played middle person. What I learned is that it was my job to extract as much possible work out of my team at their current salaries without them quitting. Twice being told, “they’ll get raises soon, don’t worry!”
Those raises never came, the company restructured, a bunch of us lost our jobs, and I never took on a direct manager role again.
People are 'unhappy' because they're not at the top of the social hierarchy. The people at the top are not happy because everyone wants a piece of them and they get no peace.
It's all bullshit. Just live your life.
Only my opinion of course :)
Pretty wise for an 18 year old.
How exactly you get there is totally beyond me, and I'm not entirely sure how to articulate what I mean by "story". But I think you lose something when you give up on trying to engineer stories with happy endings. I don't think you can really live your life fully unless you have some sort of hope for the future.
But never be satisfied, always strive for a little more. That’s human nature. The trick is to strive for growth, and it doesn’t have to be for material things. Strive to lean more, to grow your career, to save up or budget for that thing you want, or to travel to that place. Never stop exploring. That’s the key. You gotta channel that strive for something that won’t leave u empty when u get there, and realize that voice is always gonna be in the back of your head saying, “well now what do I want”
This is really important.
We didn’t become the dominant species on this planet because contentment was easy to find.
Humans are designed to always want more, even if they have more than anyone alive ever has.
Understanding this can lead to contentment because whenever you find yourself unhappy, it’s much easier to be ok with it if you realize that’s the natural state of being.
Anyone interested in learning more about this idea should look up Saghguru.
Happiness is an eternal conflict between what we have, what we think we should have and what we see others having. Even if you're at the top of the totem pole, happiness isn't guaranteed - where's the joy of having everything, only to see others struggling?
In fact, this comes in part from this understanding that there's no good or bad, rather there are things that make us happy and things that make us sad. These are not always consistent though. For example, we might get sad at something which later we find out was - based on rational and logical considerations - actually a good thing, or become happy at something which is in fact a bad thing.
Our "wants" promise us "happiness", but the joy we get from that is most likely short-term. On the other hand, pursuing our "needs" brings about "good" things in our lives, the joy of which is more long-term. And while getting what we need doesn't necessarily makes us happy, not getting it does in fact make us sad.
Two problems exist though: (1) while we think we know what we want, we might in fact have no clue as to what we really want, thus always follow wrong leads; (2) we can only know what we need after we have achieved it. It takes a lot of self-knowledge to really figure out "where we are supposed to be", "what we are supposed to do", and "when". The answers to these questions tell us what we actually "need".
Example: a person with talents in music but interested in math (in which he/she is only mediocre) is better off pursuing music as that is what he/she needs to do. What he/she wants to do is however, math. You tell me: wouldn't pursuing a dead-end job in math bring about an interminable series of sadness where the person realizes he/she can never be among the top math geniuses?
> To understand the limitation of things, desire them. - Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching
How can we be over promised when it is only us who can determine how much happiness we get out of stuff we buy?