Yahoo Reduces Staff By 4 Percent; Hands Out Pink Slips To Over 500 Employees
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
http://www.quora.com/Engineering-Recruiting/Which-startups-c...
Good luck out there!
(I wonder how many have lost their jobs in this country just to the upper echelon can enrich themselves.)
Logic dictates that people most likely to be laid off are those who perform the worst hence, probabilistically, it's not the best worker pool to target.
Even if those that get cut are cut because they aren't "top performers", that doesn't mean they aren't useful or good developers. You have to be good to get into Yahoo et al in the first place, and if there's a lot of competition in the job market, you may be able to get super-excellent candidates into jobs until the market looks up, at which time your employees that are merely good are not so precious.
edit: to clarify, I'm an amateur photographer with a DSLR and some big glass (you can check out my stuff on Flickr via the link on my profile page if you're curious). I need to be able to store full-sized images, organize my stuff into sets, geotag, and, ideally, store RAW images on the server, too.
Some social stuff like what Flickr does would be great, too.
What leads you to say that? The article doesn't mention Flickr at all.
Second, The self-referential link in the article does mention Flickr: http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-employees/. And so does a link in 'yahoo-employees' to an article from two weeks ago further suggests Flickr people getting cut: http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/30/yahoo-layoffs/
http://mashable.com/2010/12/12/youtube-buzzed-social-network...
(It's not #2; Zeta's methodology is very odd. But in volume it's still top 5)
It's also Yahoo's only successful play in the social space to date (unless you count delicious). They would never axe it.
I also don't know who told you they were a skeleton crew; they were hiring until quite recently.
Got a job for you starting now 50/hr-6 month contract