Harboring someone who is actively breaking the law doesn't seem that controversial.
> leaving food and water
Littering and providing assistance to someone breaking the law.
Harboring someone who is actively breaking the law doesn't seem that controversial.
> leaving food and water
Littering and providing assistance to someone breaking the law.
These immigrants are breaking your laws and it's understandable if they aren't accepted, but waiting for them to die crosses the line into evil. Sometimes the moral alternative is illegal, but that doesn't make it wrong.
It was illegal to harbor fugitive slaves.
It was moral to break that law.
If you think the issue is that clear-cut, you end up on the side of slavers.
It's illegal to harbor rapists, murderers, drug smugglers and sex traffickers.
If you think that's legal, you're on the side of rapists, murderers, drug smugglers and sex traffickers.
I don't think it's clear-cut.