This is too trivial to share, IMO.
Anyway, shell is more suitable for this kind of programs: you could write a bash script that ties together youtube-dl and dmenu or fzf or whatever within an hour.
Anyway, shell is more suitable for this kind of programs: you could write a bash script that ties together youtube-dl and dmenu or fzf or whatever within an hour.
How do you define complexity threshold for something being worth sharing?
More to the point, why do you define that threshold? What benefit is there to saying someone's work that they're sharing has to be sufficiently complicated? Simple things can be immensely useful and well worth sharing.
On the contrary, I find that a lot of tools I'm happy to have are the trivials one.
Who have never used whoami for example ? It's two chained system calls, but I'm still glad it's baked in and I don't have to rewrite it everywhere I use it.
Personally I'd probably go a similar approach as yourself but that's purely because I don't have node installed.