There's no way to avoid clicking on it, as it follows you around and grabs your attention, not letting you read.
There's no way to avoid clicking on it, as it follows you around and grabs your attention, not letting you read.
I scrolled down to see how long the article is. That somehow also triggered a redirect to the root.
How is it possible that the most user hostile news sites often get the most visibility? Even here on HN which is so user friendly. What are the mechanics behind this?
The url should be changed to a more user friendly news source. How about one of these?
https://liliputing.com/2019/05/arm-launches-cortex-a77-cpu-m...
https://hexus.net/tech/news/cpu/130757-arm-releases-cortex-a...
https://www.xda-developers.com/arm-cortex-a77-cpu-announceme...
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/05/27/arm_cortex_a77/
https://venturebeat.com/2019/05/26/arm-reveals-new-cpu-gpu-a...
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14407/amd-ryzen-3000-announce...
Except on mobile. The UI elements are tiny, try closing ten comments without clicking the timestamp by mistake at least once.
So the site shouldn't place a cookie 'session_id=12345678', but a cookie 'techcrunch_tracking_enabled=False' that's not linked to any particular user would be just fine.
And you don't think they really stop tracking you just because you said you didn't like it, right? What would you even do against it? Sue each and every website owner on the planet somewhere in the EU where they might not even care?