Ebtrees: Elastic Binary Trees (2011)
wtarreau.blogspot.com
wtarreau.blogspot.com
I wouldn’t expect you were told that. Wikipedia _does_ require information to be ‘notable’, which ”generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject”, but ”copies of what can be found somewhere else” almost certainly implies copyright infringement, so AFAIK, Wikipedia requires writers to write their own texts, rather than copy-pasting text from elsewhere.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia#Content_policies_and...)
Also, if I had to review this text, I would say it needs editing for readability/understandability. The above already may be a sign of that. Another example: reading ”the worst case may happen with a small tree (for instance, 32 distinct keys of one bit)”, I am lost. I can’t think of more than two distinct one-bit keys (yes, that may become clear on closer reading, but I scan first, to see whether it’s worth doing the closer reading)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research
[2] Can be inferred from, for example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories
Makes me much less interested in whatever else they have to say.