Calorie per Dollar List – Eat for 21 Dollars a Week
efficiencyiseverything.com
efficiencyiseverything.com
https://chriskresser.com/what-is-nutrient-density-and-why-is...
You need more than flour and sugar to survive.
Neither has any D or B12. You need specifically liver or supplements for these. (Fatty fish is even less sustainable for D and not cheap.)
That said you don't need too much methionine so can skimp on complete protein.
Environmental chicken and egg? ;)
When I'm extra lazy I also like Trader Joe's pre-spiced cans of black beans too.
* https://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-pressure-cooker/
* https://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-electric-pressure-coo...
* https://www.amazon.com/Pressure-Cooker-Perfection-Foolproof-...
Google said: a rhythmical throbbing of the arteries as blood is propelled through them, typically as felt in the wrists or neck.
edit: No need for the downvotes guys, I was genuinely curious. I bet not everyone knows pulses are legumes. Also OP used "pulse" in the singular, which most people (I think?) understand as the definition I pasted from Google.
It's important to account for the fact that plant foods often come with antinutrients (lectins, phytates, oxalates) which block absorption of vitamins. Most plant sources also supply only incomplete amino acid profiles.
Also, plant foods often have their vitamins amounts listed in the form of precursors and not the bio-available kind that your body can utilize without a conversion process. So, iron in spinach? It's not heme-iron, so it's not so great when you consider the above along with a high oxalate payload. Vitamin A in carrots? It in carotinoids such as beta-carotine rather than retinol which is the format your body uses. Your body prefers bioavailable forms of vitamins and nutrients, rather than spending energy converting to usable formats.
This is why animal foods are so hard to beat for nutrient density. E.g., herbivore animals graze on plants, converting the nutrients into animal-appropriate formats and fuller-spectrum proteins.
From what I've read, the fiber guidelines are basically made-up and not based on any formal nutritional controlled studies. When you think about it, fiber is literally undigestible plant material. It seems a bit strange for your health/body to depend on consumption of something which cannot be digested.
There's plenty of articles about fiber, here's just a short list I just found.
https://www.pharmacytimes.com/news/how-fiber-helps-prevent-c...
https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/Dietary_fi...
I've never heard of anyone dying from lack of fiber. Have you? Is there a medical condition for this?
I'm sure that some hunter gatherers ate plants containing fiber. We are omnivores and able to get calories from many different sources depending on availability in our environment. That still doesn't mean that fiber is a necessity or requirement.
A more objective view of the science is:
“...the interactions between meat, gut and health outcomes such as CRC [colorectal cancer] are very complex and are not clearly pointing in one direction... Epidemiological and mechanistic data on associations between red and processed meat intake and CRC are inconsistent and underlying mechanisms are unclear... Better biomarkers of meat intake and of cancer occurrence and updated food composition databases are required for future studies.”
"This article reviews the physiology of ingestion of fiber and defecation. It also looks into the impact of dietary fiber on various colorectal diseases. A strong case cannot be made for a protective effect of dietary fiber against colorectal polyp or cancer. Neither has fiber been found to be useful in chronic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome. It is also not useful in the treatment of perianal conditions. The fiber deficit - diverticulosis theory should also be challenged. The authors urge clinicians to keep an open mind about fiber. One must be aware of the truths and myths about fiber before recommending it.
... a strong recommendation cannot be made for a protective effect of dietary fiber against colorectal polyp or cancer. Despite a lack of evidence however, current recommendations are still to increase dietary fiber. In the latest position statement of the American Dietetic Association[3], increasing dietary fiber is still promoted to protect against colon cancer despite stating that there is no proof of efficacy in this regard ... Whilst it is not the intention of the authors to totally discourage fiber in the diet and the use of fiber supplements, there does not seem to be much use for fiber in colorectal diseases. We, however, want to emphasize that what we have all been made to believe about fiber needs a second look. We often choose to believe a lie, as a lie repeated often enough by enough people becomes accepted as the truth. We urge clinicians to keep an open mind. While there are some benefits of a diet high in natural fiber, one must know the exact indications before recommending such a diet. Myths about fiber must be debunked and truth installed."
Dr. Zoë Harcombe - 'What about fiber?' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KrmpK_Lckg
> I eat fruit most days, but not too much and because I like it, not because I think it is good for me. I eat a lot of vegetables/salads – locally grown/in season wherever possible. [...]. I do eat starchy carbs – just not daily. I enjoy porridge (plain oats and whole milk) – especially in the winter. I like brown rice and (veggie) curries/chilli.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Zo%C3%AB_Harcombe
Even if you don't believe in or care about any health benefits fiber may have, two benefits are immediate after eating them: they fill you up and make you feel full without containing any energy which helps mediate calorie consumption, and they make bowel movements easier, at least if you drink enough water. I believe most people would feel better if they ate more fiber instead of red meat and fries.
Eat as much fiber as you like. I don't think it's necessary to eat fiber to be healthy, but if you like it, eat it.
Also, I was under the impression that the vast majority of lectins are removed during preparation/cooking of plant foods
Are Vegetarians Healthier than Omnivores? A Soho Forum Debate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qDYl4zHmAg
Considering multivitamins cost basically nothing, you don't have to care about paying for the stuff you end up peeing out.
1. Take it together with food (containing fat) so it gets dissolved. 2. For each micronutrient check if it's in the best available form, and big enough dose.
I always tell people treat vitamin deficiency with a healthy diet, if that doesn't work you have a gut problem and pills won't fix it either. I'm not a doctor, but it is a reasonable claim.
If the 'sunflower oil' etc versions of the mackerel are available it also mixes extremely well with those and they can be cheaper than the olive oil tins.
Vegetable/seed oils are not whole foods or naturally stable. They are modern frankenfoods made from leftover agri-waste via industrial chemical processes. Under high heat these oils become highly oxidated and not the kind of stuff you want your body to deal with.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Smoke_point_of_cookin...
For example: https://www.amazon.com/Season-Skinless-Boneless-Fillets-Mack...
King Mackerel is known to contain a lot of mercury, but that is a different species of Mackerel which is quite large (in general, larger predatory fish have greater concentrations of mercury).
As long as you are eating the tinned Mackerels, the kind which are small like sardines, I don't think you have significant mercury risk. Canned/tinned mackerel and sardines are considered some of the safest and most sustainable fish you can consume.
https://www.csu.edu/cerc/researchreports/documents/MercuryFa...
It's not cheap unfortunately, feedlot beef and chicken muscle meat is typically cheaper than grass fed beef liver.
Cows, Pigs, sheep. All good.
Fibre is important.
Fiber and colorectal diseases: Separating fact from fiction - World Journal of Gastroenterology https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i31/4161.htm
Eg, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal...
I created a site that will display a nutrient density graph for foods that you search for: https://eatnutrients.com/
Because she was poor herself she does a good job of not requiring too much equipment - there's a fair amount of one pot stuff, or microwave only food. And she creates plans so that you use all the food you buy at the start of the week. Some books are cheap per meal, but you need to buy a huge quantity of something that you don't use again.
https://cookingonabootstrap.com/
Sadly, she's not a cook or chef and some of the recipes in the original book just don't work, so go careful. The reviews on Amazon can be useful.
Also this copy strikes me as the kind of sales-y humblebrag I see in fitness/self-improvement style online courses sold by "digital nomads":
> We graduated college, Masters and PhD. No Debt.
Why ask for donations then?
Don't fellowships and research grants already cover graduate school tuition? MS/Phd students aren't rich by any means, but they do receive a teaching stipend in addition to not paying tuition.
I get a weird vibe from the way the material on the site is communicated.
http://fallingfruit.org/sharing?c=forager%2Cfreegan&locale=e...
Eventually, both of these would become options, but when you believe your situation has to be temporary, it feels safer to starve a little.
Don't you realize that those are very expensive? Cook rice, pasta or potatoes for your calories and you could get by on that amount without going hungry. I lived on that amount for years, you'd get around 4000 calories if you just bought cheap things which is more than you need so you can buy lentils, meat, fish and vegetables for the rest which is enough to get all nutrients you need. Might not get 100% optimal diet on this, but it is healthier than what most eat.
Edit: I need to replace the stevia with honey, much more realistic from the advice I got.
Edit: sent! Here's the MailChimp link: https://mailchi.mp/2d3dc4e6d467/0i2wfpoxfe-1347869
"why do people think canned meats are a good deal?”
Canned meats don't go bad. You also don't have to thaw them out. I'm certainly no fan, but I can understand why people keep such things handy. What is the cost of running to the market more often because you refuse to buy such things? Time, after all, is money.
"we have no idea what nutrition costs."
There's more to nutrition than protein.
Yes, I think there's something here. But as-is it's a bit too simplistic. It needs some meat; pun intended ;)
My read of this is that if you can save more than $1000/month by not having a kitchen (say, you're in college or a high-cost-of-living area) then it might be worth it to eat out every day.
But what is the cost (time) of going to the market? How often do you toss something out? Perhaps, not the best example, but Taco Bell is counter to hand to mouth. There's some overhead in waiting (but still shorter than cooking), but no waste.
I feel like a lot of advice of the form "it's cheaper to eat at home" comes from fairly privileged folks (middle class and up). If you don't a priori have a kitchen, then you might have to double your rent expense to afford a place where you can cook and eat at home.
Now, if you have a kitchen -- and many folks do -- then perfectly solid advice.
https://efficiencyiseverything.com/applying-protein-per-doll...
Then chicken is the lowest cost per calorie meat, so you're good there. May I also suggest large quantities of cheddar cheese and heavy whipping cream from Costco? Amazing value per dollar spent. Cheddar cheese (we have Tillamook at Costco out here on the west coast) is basically entirely protein and fat and then whipping cream is all fat.
Some of my favorite ways to make tasty chicken + rice dishes from Costco is the Maya Kaimal simmer sauce the frozen stir fry vegetable mix. The simmer sauce isn't the cheapest option, but I pay extra to make my normally boring/cheap food taste good enough to eat for 5+ days straight. I use my pressure cooker and end up with super tasty Indian meals without the chicken being overcooked.
Kirkland Signature unsalted mixed nuts are also a lifesaver and a part of my daily breakfast. Decent calories / dollar (400 ish depending on the price) but great nutrition density.
> The simmer sauce isn't the cheapest option, but I pay extra to make my normally boring/cheap food taste good enough to eat for 5+ days straight
This is a great example of something that is more expensive in theory, but probably cheaper in practice, since it increases overall adherence to your diet plan.
> I love the Costco Tillamook cheddar
If you can't do lactose, then the pricing on Tillamook cheddar is basically the protein & fat portion of milk, without the very cheap carb calories. Carbs are always cheap to add via other sources anyway...
* Author's cookbook: https://efficiencyiseverything.com/The-Cookbook-v-1.4.pdf
* Author's weekly grocery list: https://efficiencyiseverything.com/Weekly_Groceries.pdf
https://twitter.com/eieMichaelKirk/status/102609142423065804...
Being slightly sick has killed my mood and mindset.
I can still work for 10 hours a day, but it doesn't feel good to live.
Scary to think of what something like cancer could do to Productivity.
Yeah, I love the topic of frugal cooking, but this guy reeks of the "hustle porn" mentality HN was admonishing yesterday.>Being slightly sick has killed my mood and mindset. I can still work for 10 hours a day, but it doesn't feel good to live. Scary to think of what something like cancer could do to Productivity.
The guy was talking about reporting images of "obese" people on Instagram, lest other users think that behavior is acceptable. The accompanying screenshot was him on the Report pop-up, with the background image being 4 normal looking women posing for an engagement party or something.
I'm a meat eater, but I try to ensure I never buy meat or eggs unless the animal has been raised in good conditions.
In the past when money was tight, if I couldn't afford such meat, I'd just go without meat.
TBH, I don't really understand why governments allow animals to be kept in terrible conditions. I get that lobbying is strong in the US, but what about elsewhere? Or am I mistaken, are there countries that have good laws in place around animal welfare?
Once someone is beyond being able to procure enough food to survive, utility is important to quality of life and long term health. What sort of utility?
1) Total caloric intake depending on if the goal is maintenance, weight loss, or weight gain.
2) Macronutrient split depending on specific health and/or performance goals. E.G. high protein for strength trainees.
3) Micronutrient split and density for general health and/or to correct deficiencies. For example, many people are Vitamin D deficient.
4) Mental health. An extreme approach to diet can create eating disorders and may lead to social isolation.
As with most things in life, there is a cost/benefit equation associated with nutrition choices, and focusing purely on efficiency most certainly has its costs - some of which are not obvious. Those costs can have a negative impact on short-term and long-term health. Health is easy to take for granted - until there’s an issue.
The point of my post? I hope that the takeaway from this article isn’t: “make cost efficiency your primary goal in food selection,” but rather, “carefully evaluate your specific situation, establish nutrition goals, and treat food intake like a solution to a problem - just make sure the problem(s) are very well defined.”
This advice applies to those that have the discretionary funds to facilitate this level of selectiveness, which I’m guessing applies to most people reading this.
"We graduated college, Masters and PhD. No Debt."
Good for you. I know it's a lot harder, but as we've been seeing over teh past 5-10 years, borrowing money to live on while you're in school will really mess up the next 10-20-30 years of your life.
Edit: Fixed calories per kg of dry pasta. Their value is still off though.
Edit again: I used Scandinavian prices which are typically much higher than American ones, but looking around it seems like people think it is normal for 1kg of pasta to cost $2? How can that be? Pasta is super cheap to produce and has years of shelf life, there is no reason at all why it should be expensive. It should be the cheapest wheat based product you can buy, certainly much cheaper than bread.
Fat and (to a lesser extent) protein seem to have the largest effect on suppressing my appetite, and I have no idea why that is.
Also, soybeans are more efficient than lentils and white beans are more versatile (e.g., https://github.com/nhynes/pbean)
Edamame beans have 11g per 100g - I wonder if that makes economic sense?
It's better to get your carbs from beans and also calories from healthy oils like olive and canola.
It's weird that in the recipes at the bottom they never use eggs, that have a good protein/dollar ratio and are easy to store and cook.
It would be nice to see a dispersion graph of protein/dollar vs calories/dollar.
You get a lot of protein per calorie and they're often reasonably priced. A 750mL or 1L carton is often around $6. (Sorry, speaking in CAD)
If you measure your usage, then two whole egg whites is equal to about 60mL or a quarter-cup. (at least for the brand I buy).
Over a carton that's between 24 and 30 large egg whites. The economy is pretty good.
Usually in a week between my girlfriend and I go through one carton of egg whites and maybe a large carton of eggs (18). We both love eggs. And I make a scramble every morning after the gym with usually between 2-4 whole eggs and 2-6 egg whites (w/ red pepper, green onion, spinach).
If you don't like the flavour of eggs, I can understand... but I love them. If you do like them, I recommend egg whites as very easy, economical protein. Egg whites might even be suitable for people who don't care much for the flavour as they're much milder, and easy to mask as well.
Also alla gricia or all'amatricana.
https://www.amazon.com/Food-Cooking-Science-Lore-Kitchen/dp/...
You can also use a microwave to do things like cooking potatoes.
I've been looking for a resource like this.
I consider cooking a fantastic hobby, it
- provides an entry it lots of interesting scientific questions, both in food preparation and digestion/health.
- is a big money saver over a lifetime.
- is a great social activity with deep cultural roots.
As a programmer, I also enjoy the approximate and ephemeral nature of the process and product, similar to software engineering in some ways, completely different in others.
(Compared to, say, rice, corn, beans or even potatoes.)
Funny that white bread is cheaper when brown requires less processing.
https://austingwalters.com/cost-per-calorie-from-a-vending-m...
Turns out PopTarts are ridiculously calorie dense per dollar. The breakdown was a bit different as it was what was available at the time.
most research on this has been inconclusive, so no.
> The idea behind organic is that no pesticides or [sic] are used in the growing process
Also not true: organic farming allows pesticides, just not "synthetic" pesticides. As a matter of fact in most countries copper pesticides are allowed in organic farming and they have very well known environmental and human health effects (it's a heavy metal after all).
> Organic can also mean no preservatives
In most cases it doesn't
Based upon the requirements they have on display - I don't think so. All they are measuring is the calories and protein. There's not comment on the other nutrients, nor on the salts or sugars (you'll notice that flour is the best protein/dollar ratio).
Now I have a Soylent subscription and my time spent on food is half an hour a day.
This footnote should be the headline. Yes, you can eat calorie-dense crap and survive, but your health will suffer.