London’s Tube Network to Switch on Wi-Fi Tracking by Default in July
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Seems like it runs way deeper and broader than in US
I wouldn't be entirely surprised if you had to do this to get into a restaurant somewhere slightly sensitive, such as at the top of a skyscraper. And i have been asked for ID - and patted down! - going to the bowling lanes in a slightly gangy part of town.
But nobody's going to give you the third degree to get into a Nando's.
Most older Brits don't carry any sort of ID at all. Young people often need ID to buy booze, but when you're old enough that nobody could mistake you for under 25 they never bother you. Source: I've never carried ID, in my 40s this ceased ever causing any hassle because now nobody ever even asks.
In fact, such a policy would probably be catastrophic, because there was a big fight over whether we would all be required to carry compulsory ID cards here a few years ago, and for once the civil liberties side won after a big campaign.
It would be very unusual for a restaurant to do so, but I'm wondering if it might have been a restaurant with a nightclub attached (if we're talking central London here maybe Tiger Tiger?). That's quite plausible.
But I do see your point.
That said, at least years ago, the ID scanners would operate on data stored on the card and not make any network connection to a database. So then more expensive fake IDs began to exist that could scan fine. Then, I think some bars started getting more expensive ID scanners which actually do talk to some database.
I can perhaps imagine this happening in some [crappy centre-town, tourist-trap] nightclubs, but literally not in a ‘Denny's type’ cafe restaurant.
I can't even begin to imagine why, short of some scam or bored locals teasing tourists.
Have you ever gotten a bus ticket or taxi in derby? No day tickets. A return from a suburb to Center is around £8.
Compared to say, Kentish Town west to Kew for £2.50. The TFL caps are great.
Also compare to similarly sized cities. Transportation has a massive scaling benefit. If there are 1000 people on a tube train, charging £2.50 each, that's £2500. The drivers salary for the half hour journey could be perhaps £15. The train and track are going to have their costs spread out over 60 years or more. The land was in most cases given to them for free. The electricity for a 5 mile journey for a train costs £0.50.
How else are they spending the remaining £2484.50?
Answer:. Staff salaries are insanely high because of unions. Productivity is insanely low because of government work ethic and red tape. Tech is all contracted out an great expense, and all tech is both ancient and custom, stopping them buying in cheap systems from other countries. In some cases, trains are still controlled by men with big mechanical levers which raise flags!
- TfL isn't just the Tube. Tube profits are used, among other things, to cross subsidize the buses and ferries and whatnot, which carry less passengers per driver. There's also the stuff like bike infrastructure which has most of its cost frontloaded.
- Track is not a sunk cost, there's also ongoing maintenance and renewal. They've spent billions and are spending billions of pounds on upgrading the signals, and are also spending billions of pounds on upgrading the fleet and make it bigger. Not to mention capital works like building out the Northern Line Extension, the upgrade of Camden Town and eventual separation of the Northern Line, the continuous drive to build accessible access to stations, the assorted array of Crossrail-related upgrades, etc.
- National funding. TfL has seen its operating grant from the Department of Transport shrink to zero since 2017/2018, and has to make up for it from other sources.
The expense comes from the ancient methods they wanted to use. In the same way a handwritten book is much more expensive than using a printing press.
If a satisfactorily reliable solution for such a problem could be engineered on the cheap, a private company offering it for much less would make a fortune off of all the railways chomping at the bit to save billions of dollars. The fact that no such solution exists anywhere leads me to believe that it isn't trivial.
I do (Norway, Sweden and Denmark). Still not expensive.
https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-inf...
It is falling to have to pay five quid to stand on a platform looking on as several train loads of sardines poke their heads through open doors, before you can squeeze on.
Specifically, I found the "distrustful of everyone to the point of paranoia"-part is really pervasive. I'm not trying to upset anyone here, but it's one of those things that's hard to notice unless you have a different perspective (e.g. you're a foreigners, have lived abroad, etc.)
A lot of the British seem pretty okay with it shrug
With that said, I'm Scottish and living near London and find this distasteful. But it's easier to configure a VPN then whine about it, so maybe we're just lazy?
I actually commend them for announcing it. Most businesses just hire an 'analytics' company and end up getting all the same data from their customers without asking.
Use "Settings" to turn WiFi completely off, or disable WiFi via Control Center before turning off Airplane Mode.
This stateful & confusing button behavior was added in recent iOS releases. If Apple cares about privacy, they can enable the original iOS behavior via permanent opt-in setting and MDM policy.
So in disconnected mode, or, if you've never actually connected to that wifi network, you'd think that wouldn't really work?
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/03/anatomy-of-an-iphone...
https://lists.immunityinc.com/pipermail/dailydave/2012-March...
But it doesn't make sense to me it would be probing for known networks in it's disconnected state.
https://www.wi-fi.org/knowledge-center/faq/what-are-passive-...
If you go to defcon and open your laptop there are usually screens that show all of the networks nearby devices have previously connected to.
Are you sure about that? It's my understanding turning it off in airplane mode turns it off completely.
I just tested - connected to wifi + cell, went into airplane mode, then disabled wifi, and I see a diagonal line through the wifi symbol.
But if you turn on WiFi without airplane mode, even once, you can never again turn off WiFi (only) via Control Center. You can only "Disconnect".
And if you enter Airplane Mode while disconnected, then exit Airplane Mode, WiFi will not be disconnected, but fully enabled (blue). The only way to keep cellular service and disable WiFi at that point is via settings.
I think OP means..
You can only disable wifi via control center if you are in airplane mode.
There's no other state (or historical events) that matter.
However:
> But if you turn on WiFi without airplane mode, even once, you can never again turn off WiFi (only) via Control Center.
I don't think that line meant what you intended it to, so I was just trying to clarify.
But - WiFi is very good when you are travelling outside of your data plans coverage area.
I think my phone plan costs me something like £12 per month and I get more data than I ever use from my phone (30GB), and unlimited minutes/texts.
[0] https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2019/01/online-und...
TfL do say they won't identify individuals, but for the purposes of data protection law anything that could be used to identify a specific individual is in scope, so these kinds of systems (and similar ones that have been used in places like shopping centres for a while) might be skating on thin ice if there are also, for example, sufficient CCTV cameras around and recording for an individual to be identified from those and then matched against their phone.
It looks like TfL have been cagey about exactly what precautions are being taken here, and they certainly have other mechanisms that could potentially be used to identify individuals such as CCTV and data from payments and entry/exit barriers, so given the scale of the Underground network and the number of people likely to be affected, it wouldn't surprise me if these kinds of stealthy phone-tracking systems started to come under greater regulatory scrutiny before long.
Prevents your smartphone or tablet from leaking privacy sensitive information via Wi-Fi networks. It does this in two ways:
It prevents your smartphone from sending out the names of Wi-Fi networks it wants to connect to over the air. This makes sure that other people in your surroundings can not see the networks you’ve connecte to, and the places you’ve visited.
If your smartphone encounters an unknown access point with a known name (for example, a malicious access point pretending to be your home network), it asks whether you trust this access point before connecting. This makes sure that other people are not able to steal your data.
Link: https://f-droid.org/es/packages/be.uhasselt.privacypolice/
Does it work? Am I being naive?
edit: Formatting, grammar
It was still deemed illegal under the government adapted GDPR laws because we didn’t have consent. So how on earth is London getting away with this, and I guess you could say the same about their CCTV footage?
The main issue seems to be that it's so hit and miss about correctly recognising you, failing with messages about being logged in in too many other locations, so you get blocked from about half the stations as you travel across the network on a typical commute
Basically every mac address/SSID group was md5'd with a salt that was rotated daily. I _think_ that each station had a different salt too. But this was to track user movement though one station, not across the network.
There is of course, no guarantee that they will do this again
https://gist.github.com/epixoip/a83d38f412b4737e99bbef804a27...
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2%5E48+hashes+%2F+25+b...
4G has come out, and 5G is about to come out, all in the time they've spent delaying.
This is frequently an oxymoron in practice…