Because it's anti-democratic?
> Maybe they represent a different kind of life
Maybe Hindus have a different way of life than Christians in the US. Should they get bonus representation too, since they're a much smaller population?
> And I think we can stretch this logic to the entire article. The author is as guilty as "not in my back yard" as the rich people. Move you yard! Vote with you wallet. Go live, work and pay taxes where they respect your way of thinking.
Absurd. Land is fixed, you can't just go generate more of it. And by not allowing more people to live where a booming economy is, they're hurting people, they're hurting economic opportunity, and they're hurting the environment. That is not okay.
The winners here are selfish people, largely landowners who benefit from the housing prices being so high. The losers are the rest of us.