The actual interview contains a lot more information. For example, Ren urged people to not go overly nationalistic, thanked companies in the US for working together, urged people to not blame US companies, explained his thought in detail on recent events, how to attract talents etc.
Huawei is one of the first companies that promoted the "996" schedule. https://github.com/996icu/996.ICU
Huawei started the trend of laying off engineers once they reach 35 years old in China.
Can't say I see this in black and white necessarily, but I strongly suspect these companies (conglomerates of 2nd and 3rd world countries especially, and even their governments) realize this is the vocabulary of the 21st century and are using this to try to continue marketing themselves.
EDIT: In no way do I think first-world companies / countries are pure. I just notice this and its impact far more with respect to 2nd and 3rd world.
The problem is that his statements are extremely misrepresented.
Warning: very long text -- 20,000 characters in length.
You can try Google translate. Its result is probably good enough for understanding the most important bits.
Obviously not, no translator would have a job!
You only get matching output if you get a matching input, that's a defining property of a checksum.
If you could get matching input, i.e. translated texts from different sources, that would mean that not only is translation a completely solved problem, but also that the source and target language were equivalently expressive and neither ambiguous, every word having a 1:1 mapping.
That is, they must be the same language, just at most differently different represented.
Whose to say they couldn't give two different people varying translations into English based on the exact same article?
It would be an authoritarian governments wet dream.