That entirely depends on the strength if your password. That iPhone 6 had a 4 digit PIN plus a hardware salt. 4 digits is bad as that's only 1000 guesses to get the correct code (if you get the salt). The iPhone 6 had additional code to stop brute forcing, and that was the crux of the issue. Eventually they paid someome for a software exploit (the FBI director at the time, Comey complained that was "unsustainable").

If your extra paranoid about the government or whoever decrypting your phone, use a strong passphrase and only use it for decrypting your phone. Also turn if off before any interactions with police/TSA/NSA/whoever. This will work for any reasonably new Android. If you don't trust me feel free to dig into the code yourself!

The Pixel 2+ have an equivalent to the iPhone's Secure Enclave: https://www.blog.google/products/pixel/titan-m-makes-pixel-3...

But honestly, the government will either shoulder-surf your PIN code or make you unlock it with your finger, or just snatch the phone from you while its unlocked.

They bought an exploit to unlock the San Bernardino phone, but they only really needed to do that because the owner was dead and Apple stopped their routine cooperation.

If the federal government is in your threat model, this is the wrong place to be protecting.

From what I understand, the pixel 3a contains the titan m security hardware that is detailed here: https://www.blog.google/products/pixel/titan-m-makes-pixel-3... (this talks about the pixel 3 but the 3a has the same thing from what I have read)

... but of course XKCD got it completely right: https://www.xkcd.com/538/

I thought the federal government was able to from the whole San Bernardino shooting suspect's phone?