Ignoring a judge, purposefully and with premeditation, is not going to earn anyone reduced punishment. It is contempt of court.
Again, if the law has ethical problems it is reasonable to put up a bit of a struggle. Just don't complain about the justice system is somehow doing anything unexpected - the problem sits with the lawmakers.
The fact that this has to be explained shows how sheltered and naive some people are
If they're not happy they can move to a low law enforcement country, apparently it would be the paradise for them (except for the fact you'll probably be robbed most often than not, still)
> If they're not happy they can move to a low law enforcement country, apparently it would be the paradise for them (except for the fact you'll probably be robbed most often than not, still)
Haha, yeah, because of high law enforcement the USA is a paradise where no violence or robberies take place. I don't know about robberies, but there's a lot less violence in my country than in yours where shootings are regular.
Would still rather my nation have fairer law enforcement practices.
Sufficient enforcement is not a guarantee of lower crime rates
And again, it's a bit of lack of knowledge of how things work in the 3rd world
The law or rather the judges make judgement calls all the time. Does someone get bail? Does this person hide something? Is this interpretation by a lawyer sound? What mitigating circumstances should be considered in a judgement?
It's not like people ask for something unprecedented here and the law up until now was some mechanical process that always lead to the same outcome.