Sadly they are a little outside of the human realm of experience, both in their single units (waaay to small usually) and in the units that the list contains (speed, electrical charge, etc; where we like "introductory" units such as length, time, weight)
Realistically, we might also have shorthands for a convenient order of magnitude for each of the units
http://www.ihst.ru/personal/tomilin/papers/tomil.pdf
but these types of decisions should probably be left for whenever people can economically measure the constants with enough precision to be serious about switching.
gram -> millikilogram
milligram -> microkilogram
metric ton -> kilokilogram
...never mind.Aside, are the mega and giga prefixes ever used for anything except bits and bytes?
(Edit: OK, OK. I forgot about megaohms, megahertz, megawatts. Also megapixels and Megadeth.)
Sure, few examples of the top of my head:
- Megatons, as in yield of nuclear weapons. Which is a bit odd unit, should be in J, goddammit!
- Similarly, energy consumption/production. Commonly used units MWh, GWh, TWh. Again, the proper unit would be J, not Wh. Or Mtoe, for Million tons of oil equivalent.
That’s what is odd about it? It should be teragrams.
How much money do we have left in the budget -> Several k€.
Astronomical distances in kilo, mega and giga parsecs / light years.
Forces (e.g engine thrust) Kilo and Meganewtons.
output of powerplants are usually in the Megawatt to Gigawatt.
Frequencys of radio waves are Megahertz to Terahertz.
Energy of cosmic Ray's goes all the way up to zetta electronvolts.
I could name more
Laughed at that one.
I share your consternation with the kilogram's name, but it is almost as fundamental to our units as Franklin's implicit, and perhaps unfortunate, choice to call the charge of the electron negative.
Furthermore, the pound is a unit of force. One can find locations (poles and equator) on Earth's surface where the measured weights of an object can differ by at least 0.5% [1], making any definition of mass based upon weight troublesome.