Most European and Asian (specifically Japanese) cities have very good connectivity from the outskirts into the city centers.
Granted, it can be complicated and time consuming to connect from outskirt to outskirt. This is no reason, however, to throw away well working public systems of connectivity for some pipe dream, which still uses much too much resources for the density of a city.
Big enough also to takes prams/buggies/bicycles/luggage/large shopping items, so that people can also get to do many of the normal things they would do with their day and still use public transport.
A bus averaging 20mph running 24/7/365 puts 175,000 miles on it yearly. Ignoring fuel costs, that's a lot of wear & tear on the moving parts. How many passenger miles per day do you need to get out of the bus for it to be economical?
It’s likely the electric drivetrains in modern buses will last longer than their diesel predecessors, while reducing maintenance costs.
I haven’t seen anything like Beijing or Manila since moving to LA and then Seattle, America has first world traffic problems only.
- Near-perfect safety would reduce the need for structural safety. That could cut size and weight drastically
- Coordination might allow more efficient use of roads, obviating the need for multiple lanes, allowing cars to travel bumper-to-bumper, drastically increase throughput on intersections