But yeah, it's not obvious that depression would spread e.g. within a class like a flu.
I tend to think that depression is both on the rise, and historically under-treated. In fact, it's most likely still under-treated. I'm neutral on the efficacy of treatment.
Many doctors still believe the "correcting neurotransmitter imbalance" theory of SSRI action which appears to be on its way to being disproved.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...
This meta analysis has John Ionaddis as one of the coauthors (if you don’t know why this is interesting look it up).
Also nothing is easily “disproved” in medicine (or most science) so even if “neurotransmitter imbalance” is false, you’re still wrong nothing is on the way to being disproved. Furthermore, current understanding of SSRI effectiveness is not based on “correcting neurotransmitter imbalance”.
I probably should have emphasized this portion of the statement. SSRI's definitely have lots of good studies on the indication of acute depression and MDD. However, many psychiatrists view SSRIs as a set-it-and-forget-it long-term solution to other chronic issues, which I find troubling.
Please do not spread such misinformation without anything other than opinion.
SSRIs can cause unpleasant and even dangerous withdrawal symptoms when discontinuing long-term use, so there are real benefits to minimizing overprescription.
69% of the DSM-5 task force had ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
Diagnosis rates grow each year, and the number of ambiguously defined mental illnesses increases with every revision of the DSM. These data points are used as justification for further increases in funding, which in turn increases diagnosis rates.
This pressure increases the pressure to make it so more of the population is defined as being mentally ill so they can get medical treatment.
Also, pardon my ignorance, but I am also curious what counts as being diagnosed with "anxiety" disorder? As in are there definitive definitions of these things?
Both although I'm very skeptical that diagnosing more people as mentally ill is the same as an improvement. The criteria to be diagnosed with a mental illness has loosened. Probably the most extreme example is the DSM-V declaring bereavement over 2 weeks to be a form of mental illness - depression. What has been considered normal human behavior for most of human history has been medicalized.
I've seen no evidence that increases in diagnosis in the last 2 decades have improved mental health in the developed world. Metrics like the suicide rate have gotten worse during that time. Self-reported anxiety and depression is on its way up.
This is not to say you cannot find individuals or groups helped. However the increase in labelling causes insecurity/stigma, while the field itself like all field does have some deadweight costs. The mental health field also, even if it effective are getting overwhelmed by broader societal issues.
"Kid's bored at school? Get them some ADHD drugs!".
(Not that there aren't legitimate cases, but there's also mass over-prescription).
Mental health problems are real. Overprescription due to capitalist reasons is real too. They both do harm.