I'm not a physicist, but this sounds wrong. Vacuum doesn't have "matter and antimatter components", it's vacuum.
I'm not a physicist, but this sounds wrong. Vacuum doesn't have "matter and antimatter components", it's vacuum.
As long as the books balance (particles and anti-particles created in equal proportions) the universe does not seem to care, it even does not care if these particles are in existence for a longer period of time, or are separated by distances large enough that you can notice them.
This also apparently is one of the more interesting pieces of the puzzle about where all this stuff came from in the first place and has been used to postulate the existence of an 'anti-universe'.
The idea of matter and antimatter particles popping up out of vacuum has been around for some time, and appears to be the driving force behind black hole evaporation (hawking radiation) . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation
According to wiki, there's a few other natural processes where we can detect particles forming and disappearing again in vacuum, but my understanding of these processes is nihil :-). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_fluctuations#Virtual_par...
Anyway, to me the article is exciting.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle#Pair_productio...
(for a particularly cool consequence see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casmir_effect)
It case you're sceptical, the "realness" of the vacuum energy is revealed by the wonderful Casimir Effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect