He certainly does well with agreeing (with himself) that his work is great.

A great possibly purposely-obtuse example from the blog piece:

> Testing, What does this mean? Does it mean Lift isn't well tested... I beg to differ. Lift powers sites like Foursquare and Novell Vibe. You can see the Lift tickets and find all the tickets opened by Novell and Foursquare... not a lot.

Right. When people mention testing in a framework, they must be talking about testing the framework itself and not the framework's ability to help them test their own code. Sheesh, the ego.

He loves what he made, sure. However, I don't see where he is saying anything particularly inflammatory, especially in comparison to DHH's f-u to enterprises. Further, this post lists specific counter-arguments that are backed with examples. If this is inflammatory, then I would like to see more "inflammatory" posts comparing frameworks that are like this.