Show HN: Normail – un-fancy email with cal, contacts, and Nextcloud $50/year
normail.co
normail.co
You're hosting all of this on a single machine -- with no redundancy -- with no DDoS protection -- and it makes me seriously doubt your sysops and opsec skills to be able to deliver a secure and reliable product to your customer.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: box.normail.co. 3464 IN A 178.62.214.105 ns1.box.normail.co. 3430 IN A 178.62.214.105 ns2.box.normail.co. 3430 IN A 178.62.214.105
If you are wishing to achieve your objective of moving people off Google, you should be suggesting a provider that _does_ have the infrastructure to provide a reliable service, that is a reputable organization with a proven track record for good sysops and opsec, and is an alternative to Google.
The most important part about e-mail is longevity. It is making sure your emails can not be read by malicious actors. It is making sure your email is never down. For many people it is the absolute backbone of their business and maybe their life. I absolutely would never put this much trust in a service like this. It is preying on ignorant paranoid people with impaired risk analysis who (like you) believe Google is the devil.
~ dig NS normail.co @ns1.cctld.co.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns1.box.normail.co. 3600 IN A 178.62.214.105 ns2.box.normail.co. 3600 IN A 178.62.214.105
ns1.cctld.co. is the registry server for the ".co" domain tld. Everyone has access to the glue records. It's how DNS works. They are not secure by any definition. You can also see for yourself at https://www.ultratools.com/tools/dnsLookup (in the Trace tab after you lookup)
And your only MX record:
normail.co. 3600 IN MX 10 box.normail.co.
I'm honestly surprised you even have DNSSEC setup. That one hugely surprised me.
And the host of 178.62.214.105? A single Digital Ocean VPS in Amsterdam.
inetnum: 178.62.128.0 - 178.62.255.255 netname: DIGITALOCEAN-AMS-5 descr: DigitalOcean Amsterdam
I'll accept that you're unaware of how the internet or cybersecurity works besides a primitive level as an explanation for the incoherent technobabble in your comment.
I say this in the absolutely nicest way possible: please don't run a service where others rely on you when you know you are not capable of running a reliable service. There is a point where incompetency becomes malicious.
You target people who want to go away from Google, yet you have even worse transparency on what you're running.
Edit: As a fact... it is mail-in-a-box... This is worse than I thought. (Proof: https://box.normail.co/admin)
Who in their right mind would give $50/year to someone they've never met, that has no real worth, and is peddling a free software suite as the real deal to get away from Google.
Someone who doesn't know how to configure that free software. There is worth here for those people, but I do think $50/year is far too much considering that gets you a probably far better service with Fastmail.
I don't use it, but yes. $50/year right now corresponds to the standard plan which gives you 10GB of file storage. That's detailed here:
https://www.fastmail.com/help/account/limits.html
> I garuntee with Fastmail you dont get the same level of one-on-one support you get with this ;)
I had an issue once where I moved some 800 or so of the emails I had in my Inbox to separate folders in my computer's Maildir and when I synched it via IMAP (by using the MRA isync/mbsync) it caused the dates of all of them to change in their web-client to the moment I did the move. Moving emails and synching like I did is probably a very unusual thing for customers to do. Someone in customer support ran a script (and maybe wrote it too, considering this seems like an unusual problem) to fix the dates and explained what happened to me in enough technical detail for me to figure out how to avoid this happening again next time I do something like this with IMAP. It only took 2 days to resolve the issue. I consider their support to be pretty good. :)
Luckily, the paid e-mail provider space today isn't as deserted as it seemed a few years ago, so I'll ask about that instead: Why would I go with you instead of a reputable competitor in the same price range? (I pay about the same for e-mail currently)
There are reasons to pay an email provider $50/year, but I don't think being $10 cheaper than a VPS is one of them. You have to provide something beyond what one can get with a VPS.