The problem with the idea of "revolution" is that it assumes that some group, however small or large, has the panacea for fixing things up or maybe worse, the willingness to destroy things and find out what to build in place as time goes.

But no one can guarantee a revolution will improve things in any measurable capacity. The risk therefore, is enourmous. And in the process, people suffer, die and things can become permanently worse.

I believe than in the face of a problem, a slower pace of experimentations and careful, but meaningful changes are a safer and probably more effective approach.