No it's not worse. I think the author you replied to was stating that it's nicer to pay a flat fee and get unlimited viewing (itunes, google play, spotify, netflix, etc). Can we have that for journalism?
Apple News?
I'm genuinely intrigued by the promises of that service, but I'm not willing to pay $1000+ for hardware to access it.
Well, if you go iPad, $400 but point taken.
I don't understand the point you're making. If I was to read the same number of articles in blendle in a month, that I read for my fiver subscription, it would cost a lot more. The model doesn't work for me.