If you want "unbiased reporting" you get articles like: Angela Merkel ate Aspargus yesterday.
That's unbiased. It's also irrelevant. Anything more interesting will always have a bias as long as it is written by humans.
If you want "unbiased reporting" you get articles like: Angela Merkel ate Aspargus yesterday.
That's unbiased. It's also irrelevant. Anything more interesting will always have a bias as long as it is written by humans.
The Guardian do pretty well: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/ - but are well known to be left leaning
It's not like all the news articles from before 6 years ago have been lost in a fire. One can still go and read them. Even look at front page snapshots via archive.org. The different is astounding.
While that is technically true, it's also a completely meaningless objection. Like I said, being unbiased is the goal. It's an ideal.
For comparison, even though it may be technically impossible to have zero lead in drinking water, your goal is still to minimize it.