> The Facebook spokesperson said such factors include whether the person or organization has ever called for violence against individuals based on race, ethnicity, or national origin; whether the person has been identified with a hateful ideology; whether they use hate speech or slurs in their about section on their social media profiles; and whether they have had pages or groups removed from Facebook for violating hate speech rules.
But to answer your question, https://www.facebook.com/kathygriffin/ comes to mind (with the beheaded Trump photo).
The article didn't really say, but I assume the bans are considered based on all their activity, not just Facebook.
> And while that was not a good post, that was a single incident.
The Convington Catholic School thing was another issue. Probably worse in that it was kind of a call to action:
https://twitter.com/kathygriffin/status/1086932616392011776
I think comedians especially should get a lot of slack, but I'd say this fits the bill for being "dangerous" based on the article.
My point is that this won't be viewed as being fair no matter what Facebook does, and rules like these allow you to easily target basically anyone. I don't know the answer, especially when you're an international company. I do think it's going to cause more political animosity though.