Do you seriously think Huawei vehemently denying that it has backdoors in its technology makes it true all of a sudden?
Which was just very weird: On one hand you claim to have discovered this extraordinary thing trough physical evidence, yet when asked to produce said physical evidence, you can't. That alone was reason enough to trigger several red-flags.
[0] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-supermicro-chips/super-mi...
Not a damn thing came out of the Supermicro story. And now this story about Huawei where it's unclear if they're talking about bugs, vulnerabilities or deliberate back-doors--- three very very different things.
It's not that I trust Huawei either, but if Bloomberg is going to make claims like that they better be fucking true and verifiable.
That's not how journalism works, at least until fairly recently