So, to be clear, because it isn't available in your location, morally you aren't stealing, because you couldn't buy it easily, and you have an inherent right to consume the content?
I'm not discussing morality. I'm just stating the fact that you can't deprive someone of profit by consuming content you can't otherwise purchase. You could theoretically indirectly affect sales though if your internet buzz is capable of moving the scale in whatever market the content is available.
If it's not available in my location, and I'm willing to pay money for it, and will pay money if it is made available in my location at some future date, then the rights holders can't be too sniffy about my attempts to consume the content even if that includes unauthorised downloading.
You are never morally stealing a digital copy because you do not deprive the original owner of the item.
I guess I understand the mental gymnastics, I just don't find it compelling as a justification.