If I am wrong here, someone please correct me.
Bias creeps in in other ways, too. I have done both on interviewing.io as a candidate. You probably remember how Instacart has interviews on your platform under the terms that it was just an informational chat, and anyone who met the criteria to interview would then get a real technical interview. I did the informational chat and was then not interviewed after deanonymizing. And, BTW, after I emailed support I never got my technical interview, nor was I given any sort of resolution or information about what happened.
It’s a good experiment, but it falls short of what I’d call “anonymous” and doesn’t really remove very much bias in the overall process.
That reply button's in italics?!
I have a longer reply to a different HN thread with more detail about my experiences here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11679844
After meeting my PhD professor. I stopped trusting academia for truth.
Now I skip the abstract and go straight to Data.