Even Karl Marx read The Economist, for what it’s worth.
I don't actually understand this. I personally find that following specific authors whose journalism I find of high quality is a lot more efficient use of my time than following publications. Why does The Economist make this needlessly difficult, and what's the benefit of doing so?
Some journalists use pseudonyms, for example Banyan, Butterwood: https://www.italki.com/question/377016
Edit: I'd say it has the effect of reducing the impact of ego on writing.
Exactly. Who emphasis should be on "is this true/ a good point?" over "is this someone I think I should agree with already?"
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-economist/
For example, they endorsed both Democratic and Republican candidates for president in the past.
I'm fine with paywalls, but if you want to charge money for what you write, then just do it. Don't waste my bandwidth for something I'm not supposed to see. Put up a login page or something.