Thinking on Your Feet
aeon.co
aeon.co
So far, it's very evident that the feeling of being in a "flow state" or "just doing it" is not something that simply happens out of nowhere. A precursor to that mind state is rigorous training and practice. Zen in the Art of Archery is a great read for getting a grasp on this concept. Basically, your goal is to perform without any thought, having a clear mind without any judgments or intentions, to the point in which you become one with the action/goal (anyone who has played sports may have experienced those games in which you almost black out during a great scoring streak, not even recognizing what's happening in the moment). BUT, to get to that point, you need to learn all the proper movements and formations and build muscle memory, which requires a ton of intentional thought and analysis. Basically, you need to learn as a stepping stone to unlearning.
> BUT, to get to that point, you need to learn all the proper movements and formations and build muscle memory, which requires a ton of intentional thought and analysis.
This is exactly it. You need a lot of practice ("perfect practice makes perfect") to lay a foundation where everything you do can be done well and properly even when done unconsciously. My personal theory is that once you have your fundamentals embedded at an unconscious level, it becomes simpler to enter a flow state (mushin) because there are fewer extraneous thoughts bothering you while you consciously focus on a task -- all of the little pieces of the task are "unconscious" and you don't have to worry about doing them properly, so then you can progress to embedding the next level of fundamentals.
It's an all body activity. It requires a host of tiny techniques that are best learnt by doing. It takes practice. To perform well requires a calm mind, even when the consequences of failure are evident which naturally triggers a disturbed mind.
This may sound a bit weird, but sports with "mandatory flow" really appeal to me. Snowboarding being the canonical example I use when I talk about this. I'm by no means as expert snowboarder, and when I'm doing it I have to be 100% in the moment. The sport has a great physical feedback loop for me: if I allow myself to be distracted, there is an immediate violent reminder (as I wipe out). Krav Maga has this too, although its more bursty (lose focus during a drill, accidental hits happen)
Thanks for the suggestion!
He claims that Flow is (more easily) achieved when Skill level and Challenge level are both very high.
So you can still reach a flow state as a low-skill person as long as you flirt with the limits to your own skill level without getting frustrated (i.e. being highly skilled is not necessarily a prerequisite to be fully engrossed and challenged).
Otherwise what you're describing is Automaticity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automaticity
[1] https://ftw.usatoday.com/2018/05/lebron-james-photographic-m... [2] https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/09/12/rams-sean-mcvay-remembers-...
It would seem like the defense was moving more slowly, and like I was way more easily able to predict how fast they would get to a certain place and whether I could get there first, and when I got touched, I knew how to shift my body to minimize my chance of being tackled. And those nights, I always rushed for a lot more yards than the nights that I didn't feel that way.
As I'm describing it, it sounds like it might just be about semantics, haha! Maybe on those nights, I just let myself not think about it, somehow. As a high schooler, I was certainly not intrspective enough about it to turn it on and off, though.
But at least from my own subjective experience of those moments, it felt more like my perception of the world actually changed (almost like being on drugs), rather than that I was just calmly doing something I'd practiced a bunch of times, if that makes sense.
After a few weeks, I noticed that I was no longer looking at the ground. At least, not the ground right in front of my feet. My mind was able to see the terrain several yards ahead, and subconsciously my feet would know where the rocks are. This became an essential skill upon entering Pennsylvania, where the AT is more boulder field than trail. I started to call it "Radar feet".
Edit: it was 25 years ago... sheesh my memory. About two years before I heard about an obscure programming language called Python...
Great read on this here: http://japanrunningnews.blogspot.com/2018/04/how-it-happened...
1. It's interesting that a Japanese scientist would hypothesize that a high-performing athlete would be considered an "intellectual", since the Japanese word for "genius" can describe highly talented athletes as well as intelligent nerds. Sapir–Whorf in action?
2. I've seen strong evidence that "overthinking" athletic performance is negative; taking brainpower away from the subconscious and placing it in the frontal lobe is empirically proven to cause basketball players to miss shots and hurdlers to trip and fall.
This means that training muscle memory for autopilot and cruise control is about conditioning the cerebellum with training. In addition to other involuntary actions like sneezing reflexes, smooth muscle peristalisis and heart/lung functions, other voluntary functions like touch typing, hand writing and walking up and down stairs, walking in general, riding a bike, swimming the doggy paddle and all the other aspects of memorized, or repetitive movement, both fine and gross, get recorded into the cerebellum, in both the short term and for the long term.
This is why people can be born without one, but it's a severe impairment. I could be slightly wrong in how I'm relating the principles here, but I think that just about sums it up.
I can pick out at least three types:
- Planning training schedules;
- Self-teaching whilst practicing;
- Thinking on one's feet during actual performance.
One thing I've noticed is that people like myself explain physical activities with words, while people who don't have this issue explain by moving their hands and bodies.
Interestingly, it seems to work for both physical and mental abilities and importantly at any age (although some abilities are easier to develop at a young age)
The kind of practice is critical -- he calls it "deliberate practice" -- a focused practice that is at the limit of one's abilities and by pushing near the limit, it eventually becomes the new norm and a new limit is developed further beyond.
By continuously iterating on this process, people have been able to develop skills previously unheard of. Fascinating book, thoroughly recommend it.
https://www.runnersworld.com/news/a27225884/kipchoge-is-read...
I read the first third of Tony Kuphaldt books on electronics (DC, Kirschoff laws up to thevenin, a bit of AC too), very nice as it's easy, not too fuzzy and not too concise.
I'm starting Griffiths electrodynamics because I feel I can swallow more theory.
Just yesterday I finally made a nichrome wire ring to cut non-scored glass bottles. Super impressive to manipulate matter like that.
[0] I'm not in a study friendly environment right now, so watching people do simple stuff on video was my main source of motivation and inspiration. I wish I can finally go full circle with more theory.
One way to look at the problem is through Kahneman's system 1 and system 2 dualism: Some tasks are better done with system 1; the fast, instinctive, unconscious mode of thinking. An example would be optimizing your oxygen consumption while running or hitting a topspin forehand in Tennis. Other tasks, like planning your running strategy are better done by System 2, the slower, deliberative mode of thinking. The trick for performing is to use the right system for the right problem.
Personally, I experience this in two very different fields: Tennis and coding. In tennis, whenever I start thinking two much about my strokes, trying to consciously change them, the strokes' quality deteriorate. Similarly, whenever I play a match and lose myself in the zone while forgetting to consciously think about my strategy, about the deficits of my partner and myself, I start losing. Switching back and forth between these two modes is where I reach my potential. The same applies in coding. To work best, I need both the flow, but with pauses here and there to consciously think about the big picture.
It's these last questions that drive excellence in physical technique. Picking out tiny details in how we do things, then starting by consciously adjusting our technique, until it becomes unconscious.
The "self-learning" is what I do myself when I train in martial arts, with computer programming, and with any number of skills. I had my start with a martial art teacher for a few years, and now, I am going through a long stint of solo practice, as I completely rebuild how my body moves. My programming skills were self-taught.
However, wu-wei is not simply "just do it". There is a kind of natural, effortless, spontaneity that meditators, psychonauts, and others who have peak experiences might tap into from time to time. Even "just do it" has a subtle kind of interfering.
The thing is, it's the "self-learning" that eventually bears fruit when someone enters wu-wei, as it pertains to skill. The deliberate effort at self-learning and cultivation greatly expands the possible actions one can take when one stops interfering with themselves.
I found Edward Slingerland’s “Trying Not to Try” very interesting in terms of making connections between classical Chinese philosophy and contemporary US/western thought about neuroscience.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18050134-trying-not-to-t...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXQPL9GooyI&app=desktop
Kenneth leads the AI research in Uber. He had worked on Evolutionary strategies for machine learning, artificial Life etc.