Assange Smeared Seth Rich to Cover Russia
thedailybeast.com
thedailybeast.com
Since when leaking the evidence of shady dealings is something immoral? Really, why outrage at Assange who is merely a messenger rather than at people whose deeds were so embarrassing so the leak is widely seen as damaging?
How about simply not doing stuff which will cost you an election if made known to general public? Nah, too hard.
The absolute part doesn't change - bad actions are bad. But you can definitely divert attention from some things to others by feeding the right facts at the right time. So if you publish something with a specific intention/framing then it can definitely be held against you, irrelevant of the content itself.
After all information wants to be free.