This would naturally be a fairly massive invasion of privacy, but does your right to privacy and right to not vaccinate trump the right of the company to protect their workers? Eventually it's going to come to a head and either companies will force vaccinations or the government will.
If I, as an employer, am forced to decide between hiring you, an antivaxxer, which risks killing even one of my existing employees, you're not getting the job, period. I owe them a duty of care before you. And their families too. And babies too young to immunize -- is it okay if they die?
This stems from a similar misunderstanding of liberty as the "freedom of speech applies to Twitter" argument. The first amendment protects you from legislation infringing on your free speech. It doesn't require private companies to broadcast your speech at your sole discretion. The same would be true of a hypothetical vaccination rule. Even if the government weren't able to legislate in this regard, nothing precludes any private party from refusing you food, a home or a job on the basis of your vaccination status. Being an antivaxxer isn't a protected class to the best of my knowledge.
None of this is mandatory though.
If a college can request vaccination records I would expect an employer to also be able to. I know in the case of working at a veterinary office (or any sort of animal rehab) rabies vaccine is a workplace requirement.
I think a better question is if this is deemed enough of a public health emergency (which I think it could eventually be), that the information gets shared with federal gov and the wackos get thrown on the no-fly list.
Ok, let's move the path upstream then. If you want a passport and/or a driver's license renewal, you need to provide a vaccination record or a valid medical exemption. These are travel documents and I personally wouldn't want to sit next to a measles infested traveler on a plane.
The problem will resolve itself in some years as credentials expire.
You (proverbial you) invade my health by walking about with measles. I think it's well within any group, even government, to mandate vaccinations that have been PROVEN to be effective. Privacy takes a back seat to health.
EDIT: And I love how this gets downvoted. Likely by people who vastly misunderstand mechanism of disease. Also likely the same people who show no courtesy to others when they are sick, and continue to frequent stores and social establishments, coughing and hacking with zero thought about it.
Unfortunately that's the framing of the argument though. It's people who value privacy and self-determination over everything else, even the health and well-being of those around them.
> Hey, you should be forced to take injections in order to get a job, welfare, housing etc.
So eager to throw our privacy out you don't even see that you pretty much chucked the rest out the window too.
What privacy is lost by having a doctor attest to the fact that you've either received a vaccine or have a medically-valid reason not to?
A) Thinking peanut allergies are some kind of health fad or fashionable illness
B) Thinking consumption of peanuts at school is some kind of inalienable human right
C) Having evidence that a peanut ban at schools doesn't reduce cases of children choking to death in front of their peers