https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13592-011-0016-x
This doesn't seem like pseudoscience to me, but I don't really have context here. Is this considered to be a poor study or a disreputable journal?
Edit: Apparently it's been cited 61 times since publication: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=270710047801738518
Edit 2: Okay, there's definitely skepticism: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cell-phones-kill-bees-study_n...
I'm not sure if I'd call this "pseudoscience" as much as "speculative and controversial."