If you want to argue with it, surely the onus is on you to do it concretely?
> Because of your methodology, we must assume a biased sample.
^ I find this quote problematic.
Why must we assume that? If you want to distribution comparisons and point out there survey results are skewed by X compared to some other survey Y... ok.
...but that’s not whats happening right? Its just a flat out arbitrary assumption.
I don’t like arbitrary assumptions when I’m doing maths.
Its easy to say something is wrong, but if you can’t quanitfy how its wrong, I’m struggling to see why I should accept the assumption being raised here.
The js survey was very similar; it was arbitrarily asserted it went to more react developers... but no one actually proved that. They just... assumed it.