If you want IPFS to be a replacement technology for the web, you need dynamic content. Else, it's a useful static content distribution network, but it's not "the web", not even in the sense of what the web was in the 90s, or the "web" any more than Bittorrent is.

Now, obviously, they're under no obligation to deliver anything. But I'm trying to understand what you mean when you say:

    The vision of a IPFS-powered web working is beautiful

Only handling the static part of webhosting is something, but it's not everything.