We need more computer scientists in biology and biomedical research
medium.com
medium.com
This is the key point in the article. There's lots of bioinformatics and computational biology work being done, but the vast majority of it winds up being of questionable use- either because the researcher didn't understand the biological system well enough to make an appropriate model, or because the biologists at the bench didn't understand the analytical problems well enough to collect the right kind of data.
The typical model of research is "design experiment -> collect data -> analyze data -> results", and when each step is being done by different people, with different training and no input into each other's work, it's tremendously wasteful. It's the science equivalent of the waterfall method, except that instead of technical debt you wind up with dubious publications.
I graduated ~7 years ago and was also a published author. at the time. The salaries I was offered for bioinformatics positions were lower than salaries from companies from sectors like ad-tech or security, but not by a lot.
For me , salary is not the most important factor in the decision and I rather work on interesting and important problems than earning 20% more. (although 54k is ridiculous for a published scientist).