I wonder what their reaction would have been if the course was titled "Angry Black Male Studies."
Or "Hysterical Women Studies."
...unless someone thinks there is not any difference between “<pejorative> <disenfranchised_class> studies” and “angry white male?”
But it's not just the name. The content of the course (I did read the description!) implies that the grievances of "angry white males" are extrinsic, an objection to equality of others rather than their own unequal treatment. It implicitly de-legitimizes the position of the "angry white male."
Those clearly don’t have the same connotation. Male studies is a real thing, and this may be a component of it, but I think there is a real, particular phenomenon here that is distinct, and probably has a variety of causes and concerns which the course covers. We’re talking along the intersection of tiki carrying white nationalists, school shooters, abusive power holders of many sorts, etc.