To really put this in perspective, the picture quality that Netflix provides is worse than pre-digital analog film projection. Dracula originally screened in cinemas in 1992 looked (far) better than what you stream on Netflix right now in 2019. Now I know the consumer has always traded convenience for picture quality, hence the popularity of early home media such as VHS, but that was bound by the limitation of the technology back then. Right now, there's zero technical reason for why quality can't be better, ignoring bandwidth. It's a digression and the fact it's so tolerated makes me feel like I'm taking crazy pills. I'm not even a film buff, it's just that it's apparent like night and day, like a re-compressed jpg is.
Used VUDU when it first came out and recall being super impressed with its quality though. They have an HDX subscription that uses double+ the bitrate as their HD apparently..
The quality is really good on some titles, like the latest F1 docu-series. Others have terrible quality, like the original planet earth. Lots of stuttering and compression artifacts.
Like another commenter somewhere, I'd be happy with smooth, artifact free 1080p over 4k any day.
Uneven frame-timing, fo sure, but does it really use 3:2 pulldown?
IIRC the monitor, at least when using most of players on PC to playback, will just display/repeat each video frame uneven times, but no 3:2 pulldown, i.e. interlacing two frames together to generate 1 more frame every 4 frames, is involved.
I'm definitely not an expert on this topic though so please feel free to correct me!
I never understood the appeal of watching Netflix in a browser?
Why let DRM infect your browser? Why not use closed media services in dedicated, closed-source apps for such things and keep your browser clean?
To date I’ve honestly never seen anyone access Netflix through a browser. It’s all native apps.
What’s the appeal?