|Unionisation may help
By restricting the supply of talent, thus artificially driving up wages, but at the same time keeping a lot of people from being able to pursue their dream.
By restricting the supply of talent, thus artificially driving up wages, but at the same time keeping a lot of people from being able to pursue their dream.
There's been a movement to right to work, but even then, the non-union employees are forced to abide by the union negotiated contract, which is bullshit.
By which you mean, there's been a movement by employers towards the right to work for less.
> but even then, the non-union employees are forced to abide by the union negotiated contract, which is bullshit.
What's bullshit is that non-union employees get the same benefits that a union fought for, without having to do any work to get them.
Unions can keep people out of professions in a lot of places in the US. Right to work makes it so union membership isn't mandatory. Surely if the union is so awesome, voluntary membership would work just fine.
|What's bullshit is that non-union employees get the same benefits that a union fought for, without having to do any work to get them.
Take it up with the union leadership, not me pal. They're the ones agitating for this stuff.
See: doctors
How do you think they magically achieve this?
Surprise - it's by threatening to restrict supply (not working for the company if they don't agree to the union's terms.)
Revenue pie, not profits pie. A union will negotiate better terms for itself if the leadership thinks it's appropriate, regardless of the health of the company.