Do we really need to play facts <-> opinion?
In a discussion about ethics you include as many viewpoints possible or it become dishonest immediately.
You are not a priest or something like that. It has taken too long to accept premised authority.
I do consider myself morally and intellectually superior but I do fight for you to have the same rights as me and everyone else despite that and I welcome your dissent.
For example, a very common topic in practically all discussion around trans right in the US is the issue around toilets. An obvious solution to it is unisex toilets, but the right never accepted it and the left abandoned it so it is now a centrism political view. When it comes to both the left and the right, it seems to exist a fear that unisex bathroom are more likely to cause crime, through there is no data to actually support it. Thus rather than settle the issue, they fight over it.
If we could convince both side, maybe by using data from countries which overwhelming use unisex bathrooms, we could settle those fears.