Loud and expensive renovations shattering a formerly quiet block in Manhattan
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
I'd be more sympathetic if the constant noise was before 7am or after 9pm but the fact of the mater is that it's not so I'm not.
https://statisticalatlas.com/place/New-York/New-York/Househo...
If you have $10M in a checking account, but choose work at Starbucks as a barista because you like fake Italian names for coffee, you are rich.
If you have no savings or other assets, but earn $150K/year, you are not rich.
Also, there was a limestone quarry three or four miles away. You could set your clocks: 10:00 and 2:00, the blasting shockwaves went through.
Edit: Yes, my gut feeling was that I would be downvoted for asking this, but it's a genuine question. Thanks for correcting me HN </s>.
"But along West 69th Street and stretches of West 68th Street (where I live and work and am also serenaded by the drilling, including at this very moment)..."
How about the impoverished little kids of NYC who have to deal with the noise of domestic abuse, gunshots, police sirens, etc.
Or that the total number of people who care for the impoverished is a greater number than the number of people who live on the block?
Seems both are true.
I live in Toronto, where we have Winter season and Construction season. It's everywhere in the city and a noisy construction might just pop up anywhere, poor neighborhood or not.
Dealing with construction noise is relevant to anyone in Toronto regardless of wealth.
If the rich had any other way of dealing with it, I would like to see it in evidence. If the rich have as much recourse as the rest of us, I would like to see it in evidence. The article is relevant regardless of the people depicted being rich.
They're humans like the rest of us and I think it's unfair to write them off without a second thought.
In London, lavish basements have become trendy[1], but they don't have to deal with bedrock so close to the surface. The Guardian article only mentions the noise once.
[0]https://nyti.ms/2D2qPOp#permid=31403929
[1]https://www.theguardian.com/money/2018/may/07/pool-basement-...
Drill many holes at the boundary, to the desired depth. Right-angle drill to connect the bottoms of the holes. Pull the saw through the holes to cut the sides of the block-columns. Now grab one block-column, lift it with a crane, and use the saw to make horizontal cuts at appropriate intervals to make rock blocks. Ship the blocks upstate, and use them to construct a mausoleum pyramid on your country estate. ~Or send them to your dwarven workshops to make mugs, tables, doors, and thrones.~
A rich of sufficient moxie would also cut new "local bedrock" countertops out of their own basement-quarry and tell all the other riches they know about how great it is to eat off of what used to be the floor of their very own basement, before they cut it out to make two sub-basements.
Jackhammering makes gravel. Quarrying makes usable blocks.
They're already rich so no need for further trade goods at this point. Best to continue to dig deeper... By the way, Dwarffortress is coming to Steam 'soon'.
I think the idea is that rather than rotating a power-transfer shaft with a drill bit fixed on the end, you just rotate the drill bit with a "mud motor" and circulate the power-transfer fluid with a pump on the surface. The end of the hole can then proceed in any direction, and the only thing you need to feed down the hole is hydraulic pressure and more length of high-pressure hoses and perhaps data wires to control the bit assembly.
You only need a straight line if you're using the torque on a rigid shaft to transfer power. If you can get the mud-powered drill bit assembly to fit within the bore of the vertical hole, you can drill in any direction you want from the bottom of it. It drills in that direction, and pulls itself into the hole it is boring.
This is only necessary because the stone saw is essentially a cable with high tensile strength coated in tiny bits of diamond. In order to cut, you have to pull the circulating cable through the rock. It's like slicing cheese by putting the cheese on top of a wire and lifting the wire up, rather than by pushing down on it with a knife. Vertical cuts in the rock extend upward from the length of the horizontal drill holes. You are then left with square pillars separated by straight kerf-width grooves.
Now you set anchors in the top of a pillar, and use your crane to apply upward force to counteract the weight of the pillar down to the bottom. Send some decent bearings down to the bottom of the holes, and thread your saw cable down one vertical shaft, around a well-anchored bearing, around three horizontal shafts, around another bearing, and back up an adjacent vertical shaft. Cut through the bottom of the pillar. Stop pulling before you ruin your bearings.
At this point, use the crane to lift the pillar enough to get a lifting jack under it. Now you can work at the surface. Push the pillar up from below with the jack, and cut off the anchor block. Push up more, and cut off height at regular intervals. Some of your blocks will have a quarter of a drill hole on their edges, or anchor bolt holes in them, but most will be as perfect as lasers can make them.
It's only about 10 minutes. Very tongue in cheek, but people really are doing this.
I'm not clear what makes this one construction site newsworthy over the 100's of others?
Is it that bedrock excavation is unusual and should be outlawed? Is it that there are quieter excavation methods that should be legally enforced? Is it that some board gave approval when they shouldn't have and there was corruption or incompetence? The article doesn't say, so I don't get what this is actually about.
The article was written because the noise is annoying to the journalist that wrote it.
The author lives there.
That probably has something to do with the healthier relationship there between the population & new construction.
It's all just an example of the crazy weird microcosm that NYC is.. everyone living in a bubble of insanity and unable to tell.
Admittedly, I had a bit of a skewed experience on my trip: I was in Manhattan during the day but spent my nights staying with my cousin and her family in Westchester. This meant I didn't get to spend nearly as much time in the city as I wanted to (which is why I wish I had a second week there), but it also limited my exposure to noise and prevented me from getting sick of it.
Perhaps if the rest of the country stopped living their lives entirely within strip malls and parking lots for a few years you’d notice how insane that is.
In addition to that, the same real estate developer built another unsightly building only feet away from 50% of the residents' only view. Resulting in zero privacy, beauty, and sunlight. Not to mention, a 30% decrease in each owner's property valuation.
Fuck Shuster Group.
Jersey City cured me of my desire to ever live in NYC. Parts of NYC are quieter, but there's always noise. The suburbs might be boring, but at least I can WFH without going crazy.
Anything else is NIMBYism, and NIMBYism kills progress.
Perhaps their previous excavation methods involved hand tools and debt bonded migrant workers.
Increasing value is progress.
Do you not like pools?
No, it's not. In Europe, construction and related noise is regulated. This shit would not fly here for long.
How else do you think cities got built in the first place ?
I am very happy in my noise-free suburb.
Why does the author feel obligated to inject race into this story? The author could have said Labor Day instead (which would have been ironic).
Even our esteemed President worked to ensure blacks weren’t given access to real estate in NYC.
Issues like this get press time in the paper of record over other actual issues that impact people who aren’t privileged.
I wonder how things would be if NYC allowed construction once every 3 years?