I was a business major for undergrad. I'm kicking myself for not having just started with a CS major from the outset.
I don't know why everybody online keeps saying this. I haven't studied economics, but a full university degree cannot be just this superficial treatment of a zillion topics that the book provides. One page on profit. Two pages on the balance sheet. Three pages on pricing.
I just refuse to believe that.
I honestly wouldn't recommend it as a purchase. It's mostly definitions that you can skim through in an afternoon. There is a lot of pseudoscience/broscience in it, and the info on nutrition is wrong. Most of the important info of the book is in/only the first chapter.
I'm not advocating for an MBA either, but I think you'd get more value from the MBA network of a good program than a $20 book.
An MBA's value isn't based on surface-level stuff like coursework on marketing or strategy; you can get that anywhere. It's in the recruitment network that a high-ranking school attracts. It's the difference between having Google or Goldman send alums to campus to interview people, and applying online into the black box of an Application Tracking System.
They do.
It is highly dependent on what your goal is / how you want to leverage either of those things.
A bit of perspective on B-school: - The value is primarily in the network you get exposed to (students, professors, industry veterans, alumni etc). This is something that can help you throughout your life. - It's also a great way to switch careers, to a certain extent, or even move up the corporate ladder (some companies even sponsor the MBA) -- both of these you can do without an MBA -- but may require a lot of hustle. - In terms of classes/courses, I would argue that you can get access to 80-90% of the course material / learnings from online courses/MOOCs/blogs etc -- depending on what you are trying to learn.
However, the opportunity cost, especially if full-time, is crazy. It's basically 200K + 2 years of salary.
The Bloomberg terminal on the other hand, is something you can try/use for a year, while working and see if you are getting what you want out of it, and then continue or stop.
Once again, definitely dependent on what the end goal is.
A Bloomberg is rather useless imo. Anything you can find there is already public information and you just are on the same level playing field as everyone else with no edge. no thanks
I think the real question here is what would generate more value.
I used to work at a company similar to Bloomberg and I can tell you that an individual user who would purchase the terminal subscription is most likely sophisticated enough to be using it at a high level (options, futures, swaps etc..), has a high tolerance for risk and wouldn't mind burning a load of cash "experimenting"
Earning an MBA might get you a better job in the long run, but again you are giving up 2 years worth of income so if you can survive that then why not. I think I would go for the MBA if I had to pick
i was thinking of getting the bloomberg terminal partly for my curiosity, partly for teaching my kids about trading and researching something outside of youtube and google. Since they are too young to go to business school anyway.
it seems like for the price of private k-12, college, professional schools, if you just buy some data subscriptions like bloomberg, wrds, lexisnexis and if they are self learners, it might prepare them to get more out of school later.
Bloomberg if you will be able to turn a 25k/yr subscription into > 25k/yr of gains to offset the cost.
The capital gains needed to offset the subscription to Bloomberg are pretty steep, so unless you have millions or you can get some limited partners to give you money, I doubt it’s worth it.
If you want to make money, come trade with me, no Bloomberg terminal needed. ;)