Hacker News Reader

Wall street isn't a protected class.

Supreme court sided with the baker so I'm not sure "protected" matters in this case.

The Supreme Court sided with the baker not on the broad legal principle everyone makes the case about (which they were able to duck), but on the narrow question of the specific behavior of Colorado officials in the case.

Which kind of makes evoking the case to make a point about the broad legal principle odd, though.

I'm just saying that it's odd, while legal, for companies not to sell their product to a customer because they don't like his "morals."

I don't think it's about morals and it doesn't apply to a product based business. This is about services. What would be odd is if I had to accept any client that walks in my door for custom development services because otherwise it would be considered discrimination.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com