I do agree that increasing intelligence is probably very difficult. However, there are probably some limiting factors set by evolution (amount of energy consumed, heat produced, etc) which might be overcome through modern methods.
I do agree that increasing intelligence is probably very difficult. However, there are probably some limiting factors set by evolution (amount of energy consumed, heat produced, etc) which might be overcome through modern methods.
Adults are largely screwed on that front.
Most masters of various practices started when they were children and people that got into the practices later on often can never come close to the same level.
Age 18-23 or whatever where people say they are the sharpest is just like the point where you know the most before neuroplasticity starts degrading faster.
https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/28/5/764
This somewhat suggests that the episodic physiologic consequences of diabetics are linked with iq differences, which makes sense considering hypoglycemia and acidosis are direct hindrances to metabolic output and integrity.
Why would running make you smarter? It is known it does 100%. Well running improves the efficiency of mitochondria and at a larger scale the blood flow to the brain. But of course that won't endlessly improve your intelligence. It'll hit a cap at your systems maximal efficient output. Similar to genetic muscular strength.
Energy consumption and heat production are directly related to metabolism.
If we are simply making people better at cognitive tests then whats the point really? Nothing exciting there.
If we are making more Einsteins and Steve Jobs then Im more inclined to say we are increasing our intelligence in a meaningful way.
I think we need to be careful about our scales and definitions when speaking on the true nature of human intelligence and intellect otherwise we're all just blowing hot air. IQ is an antiquated measure of intelligence for example. If we are talking about extra IQ points then who cares.