Hacker News Reader

Comment by sushid | Hacker News Reader

Well for starters, it's still federally illegal even if it's legal in the State of California.

Secondly, even in California, "Recreational use of cannabis in public is still illegal."

Smoking it has been de facto legalized in San Francisco for a while now (presumably only in areas where smoking/vaping are allowed). I'd have to go look to be certain, but I believe that marijuana citations were formally classed as the lowest priority for SFPD a few years back.

I’m not asking SFPD to ticket these guys, I’m just asking policymakers to not import them into my neighborhood of luxury condos and families with small children.

And my point went right over your head. Especially in San Francisco smoking pot in public transcends class and wealth.

Maybe mine did as well. Yes, there are plenty of places where smoking pot transcends class. 6th and Market, Geary and Leavenworth, 3rd and Brannan even. Keep the low income housing and homeless shelters there. Don’t fuck up new neighborhoods.

Despite your clutching your pearls, smoking pot in your neighborhood isn't new. Poor people don't fuck up "new neighborhoods". If you don't want to see poverty, San Francisco is definitely the wrong choice for you.

Call me ignorant, call me racist, call me heartless, call me whatever you want.

That you brought race into the discussion is pretty clear evidence that your concerns are not pot smoke.

I like how you are the expert on when pot smoking on the street in my neighborhood became a thing, despite not knowing what neighborhood I’m even talking about.

Given that I was born in San Francisco and have lived in the Bay Area my whole life I feel pretty qualified to comment. But your whole "call me a racist if you must" thing is very telling. There's also simply not that much low income housing in SF proper.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com