Then again, I still receive alot of paper spam in my physical mailbox and humans paid full time to sell me stuff still call where the call cost is not the main cost, so it wouldn't solve very much and would be hard to organize practically.
Then again, I still receive alot of paper spam in my physical mailbox and humans paid full time to sell me stuff still call where the call cost is not the main cost, so it wouldn't solve very much and would be hard to organize practically.
Forbes' assessment is the effective value is $18 billion.
Look at the actual numbers, and it’s not nearly as significant as the bulk would suggest. https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/financials/revenue-pieces-...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/theopriestley/2015/12/08/usps-l...
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2018/11/u-s-secret-service-warns...
When I signed up for Informed Delivery, I had to show id at a USPS office. Seems like fairly strong authentication when compared to any other web or mail service.
It's market segmentation, full price service for those willing to pay it, and a cheaper option for business without enough margins to justify that.
This means that mass-mailers are being subsidized by the USPS’ implementation of this goal of nationwide first-class mail, because presumably they are paying less than the actual cost of mailing their advertisements. I suppose we could go a step further, and say that high-density customers are in fact subsidizing mass-mailers, which I think most people would agree is not a reasonable subsidy.
There's no routing and sorting they have to do. The carrier just picks up a stack of letters at the start of the shift, and drops one in every mailbox.
The labor cost that the USPS has to put in for a mass mailing is a fraction of what it has to do for normal mailing.