Hacker News Reader

Comment by rbanffy | Hacker News Reader

Except that the drones themselves can be much simpler than the fighters they replace - there is no meatware inside, no life support or safety equipment that needs to be maintained and checked. With enough intelligence built in, the drone can land with a very detailed list of items that need maintenance because of performance anomalies.

Plus, the AI can be augmented by a human on the ground.

View on HN

Totally. Just the HUD systems on the F-35 cost tens of millions of dollars.

My thought is that there is just ZERO innovation in this area at a big picture level. Sure the person designing the radar has a PhD from Caltech -- but it's mostly incremental optimization of individual components.

Someone is going to figure out how to be the Elon Musk of fighter jets and we better hope it's going to be someone from the USA.

But again -- it doesn't matter how good your tech is if the next person can do it 85% as good for 20% the price.

My last major point is this: Fighter jets are limited in their maneuverability when they have humans on-board -- they can't pull more G's than the body can withstand. AI fighters don't have this limitation.

That life support stuff has to be replaced by automation, so "much simpler" is probably stretching it. Plus you're talking about adding in a bunch of sensors and software which is even more complexity (IE things that will break or go wrong). The exploding complexity problem is a pernicious one.

If the sensors and computers that manage the control surfaces of any modern fighter fail, the plane crashes anyway, so they still need to be there. Not having to route everything to the cockpit can simplify design and improve ruggedness.

A lot of the resistance against this comes from the fact robots don't get medals.

> so "much simpler" is probably stretching it.

What if you used AI to design the airframe itself, optimising for the simplest and least expensive way?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com