Hacker News Reader

Comment by copperx | Hacker News Reader

What happened to pine, by the way? It was absolutely fantastic because it was minimalistic. I like mutt, but it's not the same.

View on HN

The UW no longer wanted to support Pine but they were unable to release it under the existing license. It was mostly rewritten as Alpine ( https://www.washington.edu/alpine/overview/story.html ), and is now sort of maintained by other folks: http://alpine.x10host.com/alpine/

I still use it regularly and it still works well, but I should probably be looking for something else.

Not at all similar, but mutt is a fantastic replacement. Like Vim, very powerful once you get in to it.

There was a fork/successor called alpine, I recall having to setup for my wife. But beyond that I think that mutt eventually "won". (Especially when development started picking up again with mutt-ng, etc.)

I wrote a console-based mail-client with lua-based scripting, over at https://lumail.org/ but I don't think I have more than 50 hard-core users. It seems like most people use mutt, and work around its annoyances, or use web-browser for their mail.

(I realize at some point notmuch came out and became popular, but I've never had a strong feeling for how popular. I think I'm a little biased since I read of people using it, but nobody "local" to me does.)

I was used to pine and pico so I migrated to alpine and nano. Alpine works fine for me, alpine is very much like pine. I have spamassassin tagging mail as spam, and I have an alpine filter that moves those tagged messages to a possible spam folder.

I was used to pine when mutt came out, so I always used pine or alpine. You can check both out and see which you prefer.

There's alpine, but I haven't use it yet, so can't say if it's as good ;)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com